July 1, 2026— Kellogg Hansen congratulates partner Minsuk Han on his appointment as Chair of the D.C. Bar Rules of Professional Conduct Review Committee. The Committee regularly reviews the D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct for possible revisions and amendments and consists of 15 active members of the D.C. Bar. All proposed amendments are reviewed by the Board of Governors for approval and submission to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Mr. Han has served on the Committee since 2021, most recently as Vice Chair. He is appointed to serve as Chair of the Committee by the D.C. Bar Board of Governors for a one-year term, beginning July 1, 2026. Mr. Han represents plaintiffs and defendants in trial and appellate courts and arbitration. He has particular experience with complex commercial disputes, securities investigations and litigation, antitrust and intellectual property law, and legal ethics matters. He teaches commercial arbitration as professorial lecturer in law at the George Washington University Law School...
June 18, 2026 — Six partners at Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C. have been ranked in the 2026 edition of Chambers USA for their work in antitrust, appellate litigation, general commercial litigation, and telecommunications law. The rankings reflect the firm’s continued strength in handling complex, high-stakes litigation at both the trial and appellate levels. Antitrust: Mainly Plaintiff – District of Columbia Aaron M. Panner has been ranked in the Antitrust: Mainly Plaintiffs category. Kellogg Hansen is among the nation’s premier law firms in the areas of antitrust litigation and enforcement. The firm’s cases have reshaped the substantive and procedural law of antitrust over the last two decades. Appellate Law – Nationwide Two Kellogg Hansen partners — David C. Frederick and Michael K. Kellogg — were ranked in the Chambers USA nationwide category for Appellate Law. The firm’s appellate practice has a longstanding reputation for representing clients in significant matters before the U.S. Supreme Court and federal courts of appeals. General Commercial Litigation: The Elite – District of Columbia In the District of Columbia category for General Commercial Litigation, Chambers USA recognized Mark C. Hansen and Derek T. Ho. These attorneys handle a wide range of complex civil litigation matters, including class actions, antitrust disputes, and securities cases, often in cases involving substantial financial or regulatory exposure. Telecom, Broadcast & Satellite Law – District of Columbia Michael K. Kellogg and Scott H. Angstreich were ranked in the District of Columbia category for Telecom, Broadcast & Satellite Law. The firm has long represented clients in the telecommunications sector in regulatory, appellate, and trial court litigation, including disputes involving federal and state communications laws. Commercial Litigation (Boutique) Law Firm of the Year Chambers recognized Kellogg Hansen as a finalist for Commercial Litigation (Boutique) Law Firm of the Year at the Chambers USA Awards on Thursday, June 11, 2026. Chambers USA is an independent legal directory that ranks the leading lawyers and law firms in the United States based on in-depth research and client feedback. View the firm’s Chambers USA profile here...
April 24, 2026—Chief Judge Anna Blackburne-Rigsby of the D.C. Court of Appeals and Chief Judge Milton C. Lee, Jr., of the D.C. Superior Court have announced the 15th annual Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll, recognizing D.C. Bar members and others authorized to perform pro bono work in the District who completed 50 or more hours of service in the past year. The D.C. Courts have recognized attorneys through the Honor Roll since 2011. In 2025, a record 6,052 attorneys met the 50-hour threshold, with 57% reporting 100 or more hours and qualifying for the High Honor Roll—marking a significant increase from prior years. Honorees represent a broad cross-section of the legal community, spanning more than 180 law firms, solo practices, government agencies, corporations, nonprofits, associations, and academic institutions. Fifteen Kellogg Hansen attorneys earned recognition on the 2025 Honor Roll for providing at least 50 hours of pro bono legal services to those unable to afford counsel. Scott K. Attaway Justin B. Berg * Geoffrey J.H. Block * Mary Charlotte Carroll Abigail E. DeHart David C. Frederick * Jordan R.G. González Anthony R. Guttman Geoffrey M. Klineberg * Spencer R. Lockwood Jahvonta A. Mason Sean P. Quirk * Matthew D. Reade * Derek C. Reinbold * Matthew J. Wilkins *denotes High Honor Roll..
March 12, 2026 — This Women’s History Month, Kellogg Hansen partner Alejandra Ávila spoke with The Appellate Project about her career and shared her advice for how to build a sustainable appellate practice. In “A Day in the Life of a Partner,” Alejandra reflects on her work at the firm. “[T]here is no ‘typical’ day or week,” she explained. “I manage all kinds of cases. One day I’m writing a Supreme Court brief about bankruptcy, the next day I’m defending a deposition in an antitrust case, and the next day I’m working with an expert on a question of foreign law. I chose this job because it keeps me on my toes, every day is different, and I am always learning something new.” Alejandra also emphasized the importance of mentoring and strengthening advocacy skills. As a partner, Alejandra tries to emulate the balanced managerial approach that helped her grow and improve, entrusting associates and staff with substantive responsibilities and empowering them with the tools they need to handle their matters. “I strongly believe that cultivating young talent is an investment that pays off because it allows upper management to delegate efficiently, increases morale across the team, and improves work product overall. Most important of all: it’s good practice to be kind to your colleagues.” Kellogg Hansen is a preeminent trial and appellate litigation firm founded on the idea that talent, creativity, and hard work achieve the best results for clients. Formed in the spring of 1993 by law school classmates Michael Kellogg, Peter Huber, and Mark Hansen, our firm has grown over the past 31 years–with each year proving that our founding principle holds true. Today, Kellogg Hansen has more than 100 attorneys, and boasts an extensive record of success for our clients. Our highly credentialed and motivated lawyers offer businesses, individuals, and governments sound counsel and innovative solutions to complex disputes and high-stakes matters. We have substantial experience trying cases to verdict at trial, arguing matters before the United States Supreme Court and other appellate courts, and representing businesses and individuals in parallel proceedings before state and federal courts, agencies, and arbitration panels. We represent both plaintiffs and defendants, providing our clients with a balanced view of both sides of litigation. We are most proud of the exceptional results we achieve for our clients–we have won multiple verdicts in excess of $1 billion, and successfully defended clients against similarly large damages claims. Our focus on experience, talent, and hard work ensures that our clients receive the highest quality of representation and extraordinary service. Read “A Day in the Life of a Partner: Alejandra Ávila on Lived Experience, Mentorship, and Building Sustainable Appellate Careers” on The Appellate Project’s website...
February 3, 2026 — Partner Josh Branson and the Kellogg Hansen team have been spotlighted in Law.com’s Litigator of the Week coverage for their work in long-running Antiterrorism Act litigation arising from terrorist attacks in Iraq. On January 23, 2026, the D.C. Circuit delivered a crucial victory for Gold Star Families and wounded veterans in an important Antiterrorism Act case concerning 2008-era Iraq. Kellogg Hansen, along with co-counsel Sparacino PLLC, represents the families of nearly 400 Americans who were killed or wounded in Iraq; clients sued five major pharmaceutical and medical equipment companies for allegedly making corrupt payments to the terrorist group responsible for those attacks. After the district court dismissed the claims, the D.C. Circuit reversed in full. The next steps should be discovery, summary judgment, and trial. The American Lawyer previously recognized Josh as Litigator of the Week for this case in 2022, when the D.C. Circuit first reversed the dismissal of these claims. Kellogg Hansen has been leading the case since 2017. During the course of the eight-years-and-counting litigation, more than 20 plaintiffs have died. The Kellogg Hansen team includes David Frederick, Andrew Goldsmith, and Derek Reinbold. The case and this most recent appellate victory have also drawn attention from leading legal media, including coverage as Ruling of the Week in Original Jurisdiction\'s Judicial Notice and recognition in Law360’s Legal Lions feature. Kellogg Hansen is honored to continue representing the families of Americans injured or killed by terrorist attacks. Atchley v. AstraZeneca UK Ltd., No. 20-7077 (D.C. Cir. Jan. 23, 2026)..
January 16, 2026 — The recent ruling by Judge James Boasberg, which found that the FTC failed to demonstrate that Meta illegally monopolized the personal social networking market, marks a landmark moment in modern antitrust litigation. In a recent interview with Global Competition Review, Kellogg Hansen partner Aaron Panner shared his reflections on the five-year journey as outside counsel for Meta. The victory, he notes, was not just a win for the company, but a testament to the evolving nature of Section 2 cases. A Team Effort Under Pressure: Panner emphasized that the \"gratifying\" result was the product of a massive collaborative effort. Led by Mark Hansen, the legal team worked hand-in-hand with Meta’s in-house counsel and executives. This synergy allowed the team to develop the complex facts necessary to navigate a trial of this magnitude. The Weight of Data: Why Meta Won: What resonated most with the court? According to Panner, it came down to \"quantitative evidence of substitution.\" Natural Experiments: Data from events like the TikTok outage provided a real-world look at how users shift their time between apps. Empirical Analysis: Controlled experiments (such as those by Professor List) offered the court concrete proof of a competitive market. Competitive Reality: Documents and testimony showed that Meta’s investment decisions were driven by the need to respond to intense pressure from rivals. The Human Element of the Trial: Beyond the data, Panner highlighted the importance of executive testimony. Working with Meta’s top executives allowed the legal team to translate a \"very complicated\" business into an educational experience for the court. And cross-examination of competitors revealed the \"intense competition\" Meta faces—facts that were ultimately reflected in the competitors\' own internal documents. The Future of Section 2 Cases: The implications of this ruling extend far beyond Meta. Panner predicts that Judge Boasberg’s focus on market definition and empirical evidence will influence how antitrust lawyers develop and try cases for years to come. In an era of \"big tech\" scrutiny, this case reinforces that at the end of the day, hard data and a clear narrative of competitive response remain the strongest defense. Read the full article here (paywall) Read more about Federal Trade Commission v. Meta Platforms, Inc. Case 1:20-cv-03590-JEB here..