Attaway K. Scott

Scott K. Attaway

Education

  • Boston University School of Law, J.D., summa cum laude, 1997
    • Semester of international and comparative law at St. Catherine’s College, University of Oxford, 1997
    • Editor, Boston University Law Review, 1996-1997
  • Berklee College of Music, B.M., magna cum laude, 1993

Clerkships

  • Law Clerk, Judge Douglas H. Ginsburg, U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, 1998-1999
  • Law Clerk, Judge Catherine C. Blake, U.S. District Court, District of Maryland, 1997-1998

Admitted

  • 1998, Massachusetts
  • 2001, District of Columbia
  • 2003, Supreme Court of the United States
  • 2016, New York

Scott K. Attaway represents plaintiffs and defendants in a broad array of complex matters in the United States Supreme Court, the United States Courts of Appeals, trial courts, and regulatory agencies.  

Representations have covered subjects including antitrust, trade secrets, cloud-based data and software, securities including mortgage-backed securities, pharmaceuticals, federal preemption of state law, telecommunications, disputes between sovereign States over water rights and boundaries, and federal court jurisdiction and complex procedure.

Scott also formed and runs a U.S. non-profit that provides support including housing, education, and medical care for homeless children in India.  Visit www.ramanas.org for more information.

Read More

Representative Experience

  • Representing cloud-based software provider Veeva Systems, Inc. in a complex antitrust and trade-secret dispute against IQVIA, Inc.
  • Co-leading extensive trial litigation in cases brought by the National Credit Union Administration Board as plaintiff against mortgage-backed securities trustees Deutsche Bank and U.S. Bank.
Read More

Articles, News & Events

  • The Case for Constitutional Discrimination in Taxation of Out-of-State Municipal Bonds, 76 Boston Univ. L. Rev. 737 (1996).
  • In Department of Revenue of Kentucky v. Davis, 553 U.S. 328 (2008), the U.S. Supreme Court reached the result advocated for in this article, published while Scott was in law school.  The Court held that a state constitutionally may tax investor income from municipal bonds issued by other States while declining to tax investor income from its own municipal bonds.  The article was cited in the amicus brief filed by 49 States, and the Attorney General for the lead State wrote that it had helped substantially in developing the constitutional legal theories on which the States prevailed in the Supreme Court.

News